Ranked 57 out of 57


Overall Score: 88

Indicators of Influence

These seven key indicators highlight interference from the tobacco industry in Japan.

No. 1

Industry participation in policy development:

Indicator Score:

19 / 20

The existence of the Tobacco Business Act has a strong association between the tobacco industry and the government who controls 33% of Japan Tobacco Inc. (JTI). Policy makers enable JTI to participate and interfere in policy development which further weakens policies such as legislation on 100% smoke-free public places. However, in 2018, Tokyo Governor Yuriko Koike successfully implemented the Passive Smoking Prevention Ordinance in Tokyo before the 2020 Olympic Games. The Japanese government has followed through to make it a law, which was fully enforced on April 1, 2020.

No. 2

Tobacco industry-related CSR activities:

Indicator Score:

5 / 20

JTI conducts numerous tobacco-related CSR activities including sponsoring sports tournaments, games and cultural activities. The Tobacco and Salt Museum which serves to promote to the public the various aspects of tobacco over the years is partly owned by the government.

No. 3

Benefits given to the tobacco industry:

Indicator Score:

8 / 20

The government of Japan allows the tobacco industry to advertise, sponsor activities and apply ineffective text-only warnings on cigarette packs. The WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) is not effectively implemented, allowing the tobacco industry to continue to promote its business.

The tobacco tax rate is not optimal yet. According to a news report, “Cigarette prices in Japan are kept lower than in many other countries because the government manipulates them to prevent a sharp decline in consumption.”

JTI and other transnational tobacco companies such as Philip Morris International (PMI) are aggressively propagating heated tobacco products (HTPs) in the media as “new tobacco products with reduced harm.” This is highly misleading to the public as these products are not harmless, nor free from harm.

No. 4

Unnecessary interaction with the tobacco industry:

Indicator Score:

10 / 20

By virtue of the fact that the Ministry of Finance owns part of JTI, the tobacco industry has a close relationship with the Ministry of Finance and the ruling political party, the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP).

No. 5

Procedure for transparency measures:

Indicator Score:

8 / 20

Meetings between top level officials, such as ministers, with JTI are not publicly disclosed. There is no register for private tobacco companies operating in Japan such as PMI and BAT or their lawyers and consultants acting on their behalf.

No. 6

Avoiding conflicts of interest:

Indicator Score:

15 / 20

There is no prohibition on contributions from the tobacco industry to political campaigns. High level officials, upon their retirement from government service, move to top leadership positions in JTI.

No. 7

Preventive measures:

Indicator Score:

23 / 30

There is no public record of effort by the government to regularly raise awareness within its departments on policies relating to FCTC Article 5.3 Guidelines. The government has not put in place a procedure for disclosing records of interaction with the tobacco industry and its representatives. The government has not implemented a code of conduct for public officials, prescribing the standards they should comply in their dealings with the tobacco industry.

The Minister of Finance has disclosed his ownership of shares in JTI; however, this still presents a conflict of interest to tobacco control. The Ministry of Finance has jurisdiction over the Tobacco Business Act which has provisions on tobacco control such as advertising restrictions and health warnings on tobacco packaging.


Japan Society for Tobacco Control has often called on the government to take action to strengthen tobacco control policy. It is important that Japan implements Article 5.3 to reduce tobacco industry interference and consider the following recommendations:

  • The government must end all activities that promote the tobacco industry and take responsibility to promote the health and welfare of the people. The government must sever ties with the tobacco industry in order to be free to conduct public health activities for the sake of Japanese people’s health.
  • The government must end all collaboration with JTI’s CSR activities and sponsored events.
  • The government must end benefits given to JTI to promote the tobacco business such as the subsidy for smoking rooms, which violates FCTC Article 8, which requires all public and workplaces to be 100% smoke-free.
  • The Ministry of Finance must make transparent all interactions with the tobacco industry. The government must have a procedure for dealing with the tobacco industry.
  • The government must end the practice of “amakudari” as it negatively affects tobacco control policy and public health.

Learn more about tobacco industry interference in this country.

Download a Country Fact Sheet