Ranked 39 out of 57

Spain

Overall Score: 63

Indicators of Influence

These seven key indicators highlight interference from the tobacco industry in Spain

No. 1

Industry participation in policy development:

Indicator Score:

6 / 20

The government of Spain does not actively allow the tobacco industry to sit in interagency meetings and advisory groups that set public health policies. However, the tobacco industry is required by law to sit in the Consultation Committee of the Tobacco Market Commission (TMC) of the Spanish Ministry of Finance. Some of its functions are to discuss and report on central issues in the agricultural and industrial tobacco economy, informing the government of the opinion of the sector on such issues. Besides, the TMC controls the advertisement and promotion of tobacco products.

No. 2

Tobacco industry-related CSR activities:

Indicator Score:

5 / 20

In Spain, the law bans tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship. However, the different governments of Spain have been oblivious to the obligations under the FCTC regarding CSR activities of the tobacco industry. The government rarely receives CSR contributions from the tobacco industry, but these activities receive the support and even the partnerships of the government.

No. 3

Benefits given to the tobacco industry:

Indicator Score:

5 / 20

The government has not given the tobacco industry any privileges, incentives, exemptions or benefits except for in the Canary Islands. This region with 2.1 million inhabitants is subject to a special tax regime aimed to stimulate their distant offshore economy in line with EU regulations. The special tax regime also affects the tobacco products and is regulated by the regional government of the Canary Islands. As a result, tobacco product prices are lower in the Canary Islands than in the rest of Spain.

No. 4

Unnecessary interaction with the tobacco industry:

Indicator Score:

11 / 20

The main policy domains where there is unnecessary interaction are the effort against illicit tobacco trade and tobacco growing. The tobacco industry gave equipment to the Spanish police force in charge of combatting illicit trade and participates actively in the training of national and local law enforcement agents. There is also a history of agreements signed by the Ministry of Agriculture with the tobacco manufacturers to ensure the sale of Spanish tobacco leaf. The state has a stake in the market of tobacco leaf because the state “inherited” the agricultural part of the tobacco state monopoly which is now a company where the state holds 70% of its capital.

No. 5

Procedure for transparency measures:

Indicator Score:

5 / 20

The transparency of the interactions, when indispensable, between the government and tobacco companies, is limited. The government requires the registration of all economic operators, including importers, distributors, manufacturers and retailers of tobacco products, but not of lobbyists. Also, the Ministers of the national government make their daily meeting agendas available online, but not other officials of the national government.

No. 6

Avoiding conflicts of interest:

Indicator Score:

12 / 20

The law permits, with limitations, legal contributions to political parties, including to candidates and campaigns, from private individuals but not private companies, businesses or foundations. The law, however, does not regulate contributions from corporations to foundations of political parties, provided contributions serve only the purposes of the foundations. Moreover, there have been striking cases of retired senior government officials working for the tobacco industry. Lastly, the economic interest of the state in the tobacco market through CETARSA and the permeable TMC creates an apparent conflict of interest.

No. 7

Preventive measures:

Indicator Score:

19 / 30

The government has formulated, adopted and implemented a code of conduct for public officials, not specifically prescribing the standards with which they should comply in their dealings with the tobacco industry. Also, such a code of conduct for public employees and political appointees is insufficient to deal with the range of the tobacco industry’s typical interference activities. For example, public employees and political appointees may own up to 10% of companies of the tobacco industry.

No procedure has been found by which the national government has put in place a procedure for disclosing the records of the interaction with the tobacco industry and its representatives. Also, no publicly available information has been found indicating that the national or regional governments are raising awareness within its departments on policies relating to FCTC Article 5.3 Guidelines.

Recommendations

These are ways Spain can deter interference from the tobacco industry:

  • Given the vested interest of the state-owned tobacco-growing company CETARSA and the porousness of the regulatory body of the TMC to the influence of the tobacco industry, a firewall should be built around those bodies to safeguard the political and policy independence of the government on matters related to tobacco.
  • It is urgent to establish criteria to limit interactions with the tobacco industry to the indispensable level and ensure the total transparency of the interactions that occur. At a minimum, the agenda, minutes and agreements reached during said meetings should be made public.
  • The regulation needs to be improved to define better and penalize conflicts of interest for government officials and employees, specifically with the tobacco industry. To this effect, it is indispensable to raise awareness about tobacco industry interference in the national and regional governments, particularly in departments usually involved in CSR activities of the industry, such as finance, development, health, environment and women’s issues.

Learn more about tobacco industry interference in this country.

Download a Country Fact Sheet