Secretariat of the 26th International Conference on the Future of Asia
May 14, 2021
Dear Secretariat,
We, the undersigned, are writing to express our concern regarding tobacco industry sponsorship and speaker representation in the 26th International Conference on the Future of Asia. We ask you to end your agreements with Philip Morris Japan (PMJ) and Philip Morris International (PMI) to align the event with good governance and the UN Sustainable Development Goals and to protect the reputations of your most high-profile speakers.
Tobacco advertising, including company names, is restricted or banned in many Asian countries. By emblazoning PMJ’s logo across your website and materials, you may be undermining national laws and promoting an industry that causes social, environmental, health and economic harm across Asia. Globally, US$1.4 trillion is lost to tobacco use every year. You also risk creating the misleading impression that dignitaries and heads of state speaking at the conference endorse PMJ and the wider tobacco industry.
By sharing a stage with PMI’s new CEO, Jacek Olczak, prestigious regional leaders may be unknowingly led into violations of their country’s commitments under a global treaty—The World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC). The treaty requires they limit unnecessary interactions with the tobacco industry. Most countries also support the UN Sustainable Development Goals, which commits them to implement the treaty in full. It reflects poorly on this event and Nikkei to place these speakers in such a difficult position.
Concern about tobacco industry involvement goes further than just political attendees. A recent event on Science Diplomacy, organized by Foreign Policy, was cancelled when other speakers from academic, diplomatic and intergovernmental organizations pulled out after discovering that they were expected to share a platform with a speaker from PMI. Additionally, efforts by PMI to buy a presence on the side-lines of the World Economic Forum—it is excluded from the Forum itself—were also called out by Adrian Monck, of the WEF managing board, among others. Have other speakers confirmed to you that they are willing to share a platform with the tobacco industry?
Why is Nikkei providing the tobacco industry with unwarranted credibility, now?
Based on publicly available information dating back to 2010, we have not found a record of prior tobacco industry participation in the Future of Asia conference. If the rationale for change is based on PMI and PMJ’s corporate transformation narrative, analysis suggests this positioning is the latest tactic in PMI’s strategy to influence policymakers, change public perception and side-line Ministries of Health and the WHO. How is this a credible partner in efforts to recover and re-build healthier, stronger economies, post-COVID?
By engaging your conference, PMI may be seeking favorable brand exposure and media coverage, to facilitate more favorable markets across Asia for its products and to distract from inconvenient truths and allegations:
You are enabling PMI to align itself with The Future of Asia, after a pandemic that shone a spotlight on the personal, social, business and economic costs of disease and avoidable death. Each death from COVID-19 is a tragedy, as is each preventable death from the ongoing tobacco epidemic that continues to kill more than eight million people every year—many of them in their most economically productive years.
The tobacco industry has already driven an epidemic—of tobacco use and related harm—across Asia. This industry represents a risk to Asia’s future and should be held accountable, not rewarded. Tobacco companies, including PMI and PMJ, are not credible partners in health, development, COVID recovery or discussions on building a healthier and stronger future. Their involvement here allows them to exploit the trusted brands of Nikkei and the International Conference, while exposing both to reputational risk. Will politicians and other stakeholders trust you in subsequent years, if you knowingly place them in a difficult or unwelcome position in 2021?
There is still time for Nikkei to act responsibly and show true leadership on this issue, providing a platform for facts and honest debate rather than tobacco industry spin. We respectfully request that you end PMJ’s corporate sponsorship of your conference and remove Jacek Olczak from the programme.
Yours respectfully,
The undersigned organizations and individuals
Dr Tara Singh Bam, Director of the Board, Asia Pacific Cities Alliance for Tobacco Control
Mr Matthew Myers, President, Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids
Ms Leslie Rae Ferat, Executive Director, Framework Convention Alliance
Professor Nuntavarn Vichit-Vadakan, Executive Chair, Global Centre for Good Governance in Tobacco Control, and a partner in STOP, a Global Tobacco Industry Watchdog
Mr Ramon San Pascual, Executive Director, Health Care Without Harm
Dr Manabu Sakuta, MD, Chairman, The Japan Society for Tobacco Control
Ms Katie Dain, Chief Executive Officer, The NCD Alliance
Dr Ulysses Dorotheo, Executive Director, South East Asia Tobacco Control Alliance
Dr Gan Quan, Director of Tobacco Control, The Union, and a partner in STOP, a Global Tobacco Industry Watchdog
Dr Cary Adams, Chief Executive Officer, The Union for International Cancer Control
HRH Princess Dina Mired of Jordan, Immediate Past President of The Union for International Cancer Control
Professor Anna Gilmore, Director of the Tobacco Control Research Group, University of Bath, and a partner in STOP, a Global Tobacco Industry Watchdog
Ms Sandra Mullin, Senior Vice President, Vital Strategies, and a partner in STOP, a Global Tobacco Industry Watchdog
