2. Tobacco taxes can reduce poverty and inequity.
The UN has stated that eradicating poverty is “the greatest global challenge and an indispensable requirement for sustainable development.” Higher tobacco taxes can help address the problem of poverty in a number of ways. Tobacco use often severely strains household budgets, and that strain is felt most sharply in low-income households. The detrimental financial effects of tobacco use are experienced in several ways. Spending on tobacco products can keep some households from advancing economically, as money that could be used for essentials, like housing, healthy food and education, is diverted to tobacco. For example, in low-income households in Indonesia, where 71% of adult males used tobacco in 2020, cigarettes were the second-largest household expense after rice. Spending on healthcare for tobacco-related disease can further strain a household’s budget, as do wages lost to tobacco-attributable sickness. Additionally, when a household’s primary earner suffers a premature death due to tobacco use, a household may be left without an income, to say nothing of the devastating emotional impact of losing a family member.
More price-conscious consumers, such as youth or those with low incomes, are more responsive to tobacco price increases, and are thus more likely to quit or reduce their tobacco use. Higher tobacco prices due to taxes present a critical opportunity to break the cycle of tobacco use and poverty from continuing to the next generation.
3. Tobacco taxes can help fund development goals and programs like healthcare, tobacco use reduction programs and more.
Domestic resources are said to be central to sustainable development, and raising tobacco taxes can help shore up much-needed domestic resources—especially in low- and middle-income countries, where 80% of the world’s tobacco users live. Doing so can lead to significant returns. A study of six Asia-Pacific countries showed that for every unit of local currency invested in increasing tobacco taxes, countries would gain a return of between 20 and 1,057 units over 15 years.
Countries are already using tobacco taxes to fund domestic development. In the Philippines, for example, revenues from the country’s “sin tax” on tobacco has been used to help fund its universal healthcare program. Since its passage in 2012, the country’s sin taxes have raised billions of dollars, and by 2022, its health insurance program, PhilHealth, saw subsidies five times greater than in 2013. Other countries are using earmarked tobacco taxes to fund non-communicable disease programs, physical fitness and sport promotion and more.
Tobacco taxes can only help if they’re implemented effectively
Policymakers can design tobacco tax policies to increase their efficacy. To start, governments should raise tobacco taxes to meet WHO’s best practice recommendation of at least 75% of tobacco’s retail price, and should be prepared to make subsequent regular (e.g., annually) increases to keep tobacco less affordable relative to inflation and increasing wages.
Policymakers should also try to simplify tobacco tax structures. In countries with complicated tax tiers, where tobacco products are taxed differently based on a number of factors, tobacco companies can maneuver their products into lower tax categories and consumers can almost always find a cheaper substitute. Uniform tax structures tend to raise the price of all tobacco products and keep all prices generally higher.
Governments must also keep the industry out of policymaking to prevent it from influencing tax legislation in its favor, taking away the society-wide financial and health benefits.